standardized equipment Search Results


93
LGC Standards hela cell line
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Hela Cell Line, supplied by LGC Standards, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hela cell line/product/LGC Standards
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hela cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
KCAS Bioanalytical and Biomarker Services liquid chromatography
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Liquid Chromatography, supplied by KCAS Bioanalytical and Biomarker Services, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/liquid chromatography/product/KCAS Bioanalytical and Biomarker Services
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
liquid chromatography - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International core solution
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Core Solution, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/core solution/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
core solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
nSpire Health Inc standardized spirometry equipment
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standardized Spirometry Equipment, supplied by nSpire Health Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standardized spirometry equipment/product/nSpire Health Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standardized spirometry equipment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment standard shear vane
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Shear Vane, supplied by Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard shear vane/product/Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard shear vane - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
VIDAR Systems Corporation standard equipment diagnosticpro advantage
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Equipment Diagnosticpro Advantage, supplied by VIDAR Systems Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard equipment diagnosticpro advantage/product/VIDAR Systems Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard equipment diagnosticpro advantage - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Joint Research Center minimally invasive endoscopic equipment
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Equipment, supplied by Joint Research Center, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/minimally invasive endoscopic equipment/product/Joint Research Center
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
minimally invasive endoscopic equipment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SD Biosensor standard g6pdr equipment
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard G6pdr Equipment, supplied by SD Biosensor, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard g6pdr equipment/product/SD Biosensor
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard g6pdr equipment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Eppendorf AG sonicator microtip
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Sonicator Microtip, supplied by Eppendorf AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sonicator microtip/product/Eppendorf AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sonicator microtip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson standard cell-culture equipment
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Cell Culture Equipment, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard cell-culture equipment/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard cell-culture equipment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Leitz GmbH microscope stand equipped with plan-ef optics, a standard bright-field condenser, and a mears low-magnification dark-field condenser
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Microscope Stand Equipped With Plan Ef Optics, A Standard Bright Field Condenser, And A Mears Low Magnification Dark Field Condenser, supplied by Leitz GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microscope stand equipped with plan-ef optics, a standard bright-field condenser, and a mears low-magnification dark-field condenser/product/Leitz GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microscope stand equipped with plan-ef optics, a standard bright-field condenser, and a mears low-magnification dark-field condenser - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Walter Lemmen standard electroplating equipment
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Electroplating Equipment, supplied by Walter Lemmen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard electroplating equipment/product/Walter Lemmen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard electroplating equipment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: ENOblock synergizes with colistin to treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections

doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00331-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).

Article Snippet: HeLa Cell Line , LGC Standards , Cat# ATCC-CCL-2.

Techniques: Membrane, Incubation, Two Tailed Test

( A ) Schematic of the bacterial adhesion/invasion assay. ( B ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains adhesion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.023: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.048: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.018: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.035: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains invasion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1×MIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.011: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.002: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( D ) Immunostaining of fibronectin of HeLa cells (magenta) and Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains (green) pretreated with ENOblock (0× and 1×MIC), after bacterial adherence for 2 h, was performed by specific primary antibodies against both strains and their respective secondary antibodies. Blue staining shows the location of HeLa cell nuclei. A representative image out of three biological replicates is shown. .

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: ENOblock synergizes with colistin to treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections

doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00331-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the bacterial adhesion/invasion assay. ( B ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains adhesion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.023: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.048: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.018: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.035: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains invasion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1×MIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.011: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.002: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( D ) Immunostaining of fibronectin of HeLa cells (magenta) and Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains (green) pretreated with ENOblock (0× and 1×MIC), after bacterial adherence for 2 h, was performed by specific primary antibodies against both strains and their respective secondary antibodies. Blue staining shows the location of HeLa cell nuclei. A representative image out of three biological replicates is shown. .

Article Snippet: HeLa Cell Line , LGC Standards , Cat# ATCC-CCL-2.

Techniques: Invasion Assay, Two Tailed Test, Immunostaining, Staining

( A ) PCA plot of TMT data from Ab infected macrophages and epithelial cells of three biological replicates each group. ( B ) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of DEGs between the two comparisons: Ab infected macrophages vs Ab infected epithelial cells. The upper panel shows overlaps of overexpressed proteins, while the lower panel shows overlaps of downexpressed proteins. A total of six proteins were found to be commonly overexpressed in Ab upon exposure to both epithelial and macrophage cells: enolase, tyrosine–tRNA ligase, malonyl-CoA:acyl carrier protein transacylase, N-succinylarginine dihydrolase, carbonic anhydrase, and biotin carboxylase. Additionally, one protein, isocitrate dehydrogenase, was consistently downregulated in response to both cell types. ( C ) COG category distribution of DEPs. The overexpressed and downexpressed proteins in each comparison are categorized by their COG functional groups, with blue representing downexpressed proteins and orange representing overexpressed proteins. ( D ) Volcano plots depicting the DEPs for the two comparisons. Proteins significantly overexpressed are shown in red, while significantly downexpressed proteins are shown in blue. Enolase overexpression is shown in green. Non-significant proteins are indicated in black. Three biological replicates from each group were compared. ( E ) A. baumannii Ab ATCC 17978 and Δ eno strains, with or without supplementation of 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, adhesion to HeLa cells. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, and Student t test was used for statistical analysis. * P = 0.006: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno and * P < 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno + PEP (two-tailed Student’s t test). MΦ macrophage cells, Epit epithelial cells. .

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: ENOblock synergizes with colistin to treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections

doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00331-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) PCA plot of TMT data from Ab infected macrophages and epithelial cells of three biological replicates each group. ( B ) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of DEGs between the two comparisons: Ab infected macrophages vs Ab infected epithelial cells. The upper panel shows overlaps of overexpressed proteins, while the lower panel shows overlaps of downexpressed proteins. A total of six proteins were found to be commonly overexpressed in Ab upon exposure to both epithelial and macrophage cells: enolase, tyrosine–tRNA ligase, malonyl-CoA:acyl carrier protein transacylase, N-succinylarginine dihydrolase, carbonic anhydrase, and biotin carboxylase. Additionally, one protein, isocitrate dehydrogenase, was consistently downregulated in response to both cell types. ( C ) COG category distribution of DEPs. The overexpressed and downexpressed proteins in each comparison are categorized by their COG functional groups, with blue representing downexpressed proteins and orange representing overexpressed proteins. ( D ) Volcano plots depicting the DEPs for the two comparisons. Proteins significantly overexpressed are shown in red, while significantly downexpressed proteins are shown in blue. Enolase overexpression is shown in green. Non-significant proteins are indicated in black. Three biological replicates from each group were compared. ( E ) A. baumannii Ab ATCC 17978 and Δ eno strains, with or without supplementation of 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, adhesion to HeLa cells. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, and Student t test was used for statistical analysis. * P = 0.006: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno and * P < 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno + PEP (two-tailed Student’s t test). MΦ macrophage cells, Epit epithelial cells. .

Article Snippet: HeLa Cell Line , LGC Standards , Cat# ATCC-CCL-2.

Techniques: Infection, Comparison, Functional Assay, Over Expression, Two Tailed Test